A bad thing a person can do is talking about why he’s funny. And I’m going to that right now.
So okay, it’s a bit narcissistic. Then again, isn’t the Internet world always going through the hyper-narcissism disorder? So, mine is just a drop of it while there are those other people (I’m addressing to you, twitter addicts) who pours gallons after gallons of their petty, little, crummy lives. Ah, just great. Now I just stumbled on another disorder: the hyper-judgmental disorder. Anyways…
Humor. I could see that people would say I’m funny and such. But I didn’t see how humor is created. Or how I create it. Sorry, no magical formula or the seven steps to laughter success. I just read and watch things that are funny. And of course, you need to be cynical just enough not to be labeled as condescending. And please, do NOT read those “How to be Funny” books. They’re just not funny.
I guess one attribute in my humor I learned recently is being absurd. I always grew up, reading comics that are just random and silly (and don’t forget I grew up watching Nickelodeon too) and then I became random and silly. Literary critics would see this as a permanent brain damage or some Freudian parental drama, or normal people would see this as my aura of humor.
Alas, on my way to the Rivera library, I thought of the most random thoughts. One was, if I recall correctly, was the picture of a cat flying out of a toilet. I forgot if it was wearing a cape, my imagination can be blurry sometimes. Why was it of all places, coming out of a toilet, let alone flying out of it? I thought and perhaps, it was hungry and was trying to look for those dead fishes that every six-year-old flushed down the toilet as a coming-of-age ritual to prove that he was a man. Or maybe in reality, the cat was flying out because it was stuck in the waterpipes and caused too much pressure and so it shot out the cat like a cannon. Respected scientists in the field would agree with the latter because of its accurate application of physics.
Anyways, a treat for you. This first began as a small sentence…then it grew into a paragraph and a half.
Writing a controversial work is good to do because the crowd usually consists of shocked, angry protesters who need to buy the book and superficially read the book and apply their propagandist interpretations on misused quotes to make themselves look smart and the role model of moral authority and then to hold a public book burning of the book and a bake sake to raise donations to purchase extra copies of the the book so they can hand out to other people and instigate more anger and hatred toward the book and its author. And then the protesters need to repurchase their copy of the book in order to continue misinterpreting the text and burning it again. A horrible way to waste all those sheets of paper, but imagine the wave after wave of royalty fees. Not to mention it provides jobs for the firemen to put out the fire and the policemen to arrest the protesters for doing it on the public parking lot right in front of Costco.
On the bright side, it engages with the protestors’ creative expression of their immense disgust as they find more ridiculous interpretations of the text. So the author and the protesters both benefit from a controversial work.
8 months ago
•
0 notes